MKAylesburyDon wrote:
Listening to Paul Warne there is a place for everyone who works hard and is a good character, I don't think perception of their style is as important as people are making out. It is also worth noting players look very different in different styles for example with the game sped up and being more attacking in general a player previously seen as ponderous in possession maybe transformed into dynamic as the options go from players tood to the side and back of them to runners and targets ahead.
That's how it 'read' his interview. Good point made above about styles. We'll just have to see with Crowley. IMHO he could turn out to justify his wages.
Kelly on the other hand has, being charitable, "not fitted in" at all.
A lot of 'the others in between', well I'll stick my head over the parapet here, have not been good (to say the least) but how much that is due to the months of desperation and gloom that has infected them individually and collectively or whether they truly are useless.... who knows?
I guess that is what PW now has to determine.