Allypally wrote:
Coddy wrote:
John N wrote:
Didn't we need a quick fix first and a long term plan after the fix had worked, though?
Whether he does or doesn't turn it around this season, I just think it's bloody unfair to judge Dan on 5 matches!
Look me in the eye and tell me if me if we played 5 won 5 scored 7 conceded 2 you wouldn't be delighted thinking this is a genius masterstroke
Cause you can judge on the decisions he's made. He's gotta be accountable . Not saying sack him btw not yey anyway just saying you can have formed some sort of opionion
Yes of course I'd be delighted if we had won 5 out of 5, scored 7 and only conceded 2. But I can guarantee some fans would still be on here moaning about the 2 conceded. As I said, Dan may not prove to be the right man, but it's to early to make that judgment. He's got off to a bad start results wise, but the team are playing better more positive football for longer spells in matches. Small steps I know, but we have to try and remain positive.