Ormeau wrote:
Thank you to everyone who has contributed so far. Makes for very interesting reading (not being sarcastic - genuinely find it interesting getting your views).
I notice there are a few comments basically saying not Labour because Starmer couldn’t do the job. Would anyone be willing to elaborate on this? (For what is worth I’m not a fan either but I suspect my reasoning is different to many others, I’m a self confessed woke lefty socialist).
IMO he's not offering any clear, cogent vision for the country. He doesn't seem to have any firm standout policies, let alone major political philosophies. He's basically David Cameron in a red tie. Add in some of the dross in ShadCab and it's just a depressingly beige future that lies ahead of us.
Basically, Starmer is going to get in by default for no other reason than his not being a Tory. That might be good enough for those of you who are more left-leaning, or for those of you who have genuine long-standing gripes with the Conservatives, but for me, and for what this country needs, it's nowhere near good enough in my opinion.
To play devil's advocate - because this is an interesting, sensible thread (at least for the time being!) - I'd love to read a concise answer to this question: what does a Keir Starmer Labour Party stand for? And I'd like to see an answer that doesn't just involve deflecting and bashing the Conservatives.