Plum wrote:
BristolDon wrote:
So are we happy we've scored? Or disappointed that it doesn't give more ammo for the moaners to complain about?
Either provide an argument (and good luck with that!) to counter the complaints about dropping Kelly for Marshall, or accept that it's a valid thing to have an issue with.
Just seems like your resorting to cheap snipes from your 'every post must be positive' corner, in lieu of
any counter argument about the complaints.
People still want us to win, abs hopefully we'll score enough to do so, it doesn't make the decision to swap keepers was correct.
I've said my argument a few times, so cut down on the moans. By no means am I saying Marschall is great, but I've pointed out several times that none of our keeper options are amazing, people are just giving Kelly a pass because he's not Marschall.
And if people still want us to win, how come this place gets loads of traffic after a Marschall mistake but none when we equalised?
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
