Kempstondons6 wrote:
Russybcool wrote:
Alby wrote:
Warwickdons wrote:
Thought we were terrible, nothing has changed, so it must be the players??
You are having a fucking giraffe??
I didnt go but i will stat you. Took us 80 plus minutes to have a shot on target. Regardless of how amazing the build up was. We need goals. We were playing a league 2 side (albeit a good l2 side). If Coventry played well then that's fair enough, but I don't think they were all that as we had 60% possession.
You can play the most attractive looking football in the world. You don't score your fucked. I am sure you can take positives from today but I am genuinely worried where the goals are coming from as we are toothless up front. That's where I agree with warwick
See, that isn’t the case whatsoever, it may have been 80 minutes before a shot was registered ‘on target ‘ but there were multiple shots blocked by a well organised Coventry defence, watching the game and looking at stats are two completely different things, yes we do need a good striker but it would have been difficult for anyone to get a shot through their defence first half.
I did say if Coventry played well then fair enough and they realised what they needed to do. You do realise there are two halves to a game don't you? The seems like there is no creative output anywhere on the pitch.
I will give the devil it's due, but I will be at Walsall next Saturday so I will see first hand if there are any changes. Three out of our next four games we need to get things from as they are potentially winnable games (Walsall, Oldham and Rochdale). 7 points minimum. 9 point ideally. No excuses. Failure to do so we will be down in my eyes.