SW4don wrote:
Am I the only one who didn't think it was fully in at the time last night (literally at the moment it happened i said it wasnt fully over the line), and still haven't seen conclusive evidence that all of the ball was over all of the line? I'm just looking at this objectively.. i know everyones angry, but the image everyones seen, from the main broadcast camera angle, gives no proof that the whole ball was over all of the line. At the moment it happened I looked at the lino and he was there looking across the line.. if he can't conclusively see that it's over the line then there's no way he can give a goal. Yes there's pictures that from that angle make it look like it's in, but I'm not sure any angles give any conclusive proof that the ball was in. Calling things corruption and bias gets into dangerous territory. I know I'll probably get pelters for this because we're supposed to be angry about it.. but objectively we cannot say whether the ball was in or not at all. If the lino sees no daylight between the ball and the post then he can't give the goal, im sorry.
Live, I didn't think 100% of the ball was 100% over the line (I sit between 14 & 15 and so behind and to the left of the post). However, the photos doing the rounds (see above) seem pretty conclusive.