paul4040 wrote:
Alby39 wrote:
This certainly applies here to Jackson because he outright said there isn't much needing done to change the squad when clearly there was. That worried me from minute one.
That's him protecting the players. I don't think Jackson is that naive. I don't think there's a good vibe around the club at the moment. Imagine you're Tucker. You're having a bad season, the gaffer has brought in someone on loan to cover you - who then gets crocked in the first few days. You then have to play at least until March. The supporters know you're not good and out of your depth and you can hear the groans at the stadium when he fucks up.
Tucker is only 23 and stuff like Jackson saying "oh we sat down with him, his stats are great" etc is his way of publicly defending a lad who must be desperately short of confidence.
Same with other players. Devoy is not quite there yet. Grant and Burns haven't impressed. Holland has had a fitful start - was diabolical the first time I saw him, improved a bit since. It's not a squad that has great depth and I imagine Jackson must be doing this job for his CV if nothing else. Seems a good bloke though - I always wonder "would I like to play for this bloke?" probably a yes for Jackson. He has a tough job, our squad is weak.
I'm talking about when he first came in. As if he didn't feel the position we were in was correct so littlebwirk had to be done to bring players in.
Protect them all he likes. But Liam said in his final post match interview that changes need to be made. If Liam had stayed on, that isn't an attack on the players it was a fact. A new guy comes in and feels the opposite and we barely improve results wise.
We needed more than what we got, and needed more put than went.