Toby Carvery wrote:
I think this argument - that statistics have shown sacking managers does little to improve performance - is the most compelling in favour of keeping Neilson.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 44586.htmlIt's based on Soccernomics theory, which may not be flawless, but provides an interesting counter-point.
Absolute rubbish that article.
What's the point in having a manager or putting any effort into tactics or coaching if it's mostly down to luck?
Changes of tactics, management style, chemistry, attitude, manager/squad relationship and dynamics and the manager's decisions regarding transfers all have a huge bearing on how teams perform and the results.
Just one example, a manager could have excellent contacts and sign a fantastic player with good ability that wouldn't ordinarily sign for a club, whereas another manager wouldn't be able to do that. Another example, a manager who has had different input/training/experiences may know how to turn a game around and beat opposition through tactics, whereas a different manager with less experience and ability might not have another option to turn to.