keyser soze wrote:
cornerdon26 wrote:
I thought your comment about Surman in another thread was slightly unfair, whilst Surman had an absolute nightmare I do not believe Russ's 'chummy' relationship would remotely impact his decision making. His distribution was shocking and lost possession multiple times, but my guess and I may be wrong, is that his communication and presence may be calming for a lot of young players around him. I am fairly sure that was also the argument made for why Keogh was so important despite his many direct contributions to goals that we conceded. Would Sorensen in a ridiculous end to end game filled with mistakes have made the defence or attacking midfielders more confident? I am not 100% convinced. And that is not a criticism of Sorensen who had a good run of form around Christmas, but it could explain the decision making.
I'm sure you're right but, Surman had a real stinker and deserved to be subbed. He'll be back and be good again (he was epic against Hull). Bloody good goal though.
I thought he was absolutely shit too and definitely deserved to be substituted, which is incredible to say for somebody so talented and after scoring goal of the season. But Sorensen hasn't been used much recently so that much have been the reason, if Houghton or Kasumu were on the bench it may have been different though