THE CONCRETE ROUNDABOUT (TCR)
http://www.sitdownorwellstealyourclub.com/phpbb2/

harry winks
http://www.sitdownorwellstealyourclub.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=409
Page 1 of 1

Author:  rosie47 [ Mon Nov 13, 2017 1:19 pm ]
Post subject:  harry winks

karl claims he wanted him on loan and bobby didn’t. not sure how bobby would have had the seniority to overrule him to be honest, but there you go.

http://www.football.london/championship ... s-13895384

Author:  ReturnofMoo [ Mon Nov 13, 2017 1:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: harry winks

He won't let it lie (I assume it's because we are playing them Saturday). One good recruitment has been Chuks, so salute Bobby.

Author:  Alby [ Mon Nov 13, 2017 2:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: harry winks

To be fair we also wanted to sign Loftus-Cheek and Dom Solanke on loan. Didn’t get finalised.

With Harry Winks, my understanding from a Tottenham fan is that their manager doesn’t really want to lob players out any way before they’ve been given a good go. He’s told me not many of their youngsters have gone in season long loans or whatever since he took over as he’d prefer to develop them there. Only exception seems to be a goalkeeper or Josh Onomah who isn’t going to make the grade there apparently.

Author:  Scribble [ Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: harry winks

That’s Robbo being his usual slimy wind up merchant.

To be fair to Tottenham, for one of the bigger clubs, they do at least give their youth a chance and that’s paid off in spades for them, they don’t have to go out and sign players for 90/100 million pounds plus, they produce their own or as in Dele’s case find young gifted players and develop them.

The other top sides in the Premier league don’t seem to have the patience to develop players, it’s easier to splash the cash on a ready made player

Author:  dons50 [ Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: harry winks

BertieWoostersDonsClub wrote:
Scribble wrote:
To be fair to Tottenham, for one of the bigger clubs, they do at least give their youth a chance and that’s paid off in spades for them, they don’t have to go out and sign players for 90/100 million pounds plus, they produce their own or as in Dele’s case find young gifted players and develop them.

The other top sides in the Premier league don’t seem to have the patience to develop players, it’s easier to splash the cash on a ready made player


I know this is a side issue that has nothing to do with MK, but I do think reports of the Spurs kids opportunities have been greatly exaggerated. Looking at their squad, the only ones to come solely from their academy are Kane and Winks. Any other youngsters, English or foreign, have been signed from elsewhere where they'd already been first teamers. And they do spend money and mostly on foreigners - wasted almost £50m on 2 failed squad player last season, Sissoko and Janssen. And signed all foreigners this summer as well - Sanchez, Aurier, Llorente. Pocchetino's a good manager and improves players but he's given no more opportunities to Academy products than Mourinho's United (for Kane and Winks read Rashford and Lingard).
End of irrelevant rant.


They spent £5m on some young kid and gave him an opportunity.

Author:  Aliramone [ Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: harry winks

BertieWoostersDonsClub wrote:
Scribble wrote:
To be fair to Tottenham, for one of the bigger clubs, they do at least give their youth a chance and that’s paid off in spades for them, they don’t have to go out and sign players for 90/100 million pounds plus, they produce their own or as in Dele’s case find young gifted players and develop them.

The other top sides in the Premier league don’t seem to have the patience to develop players, it’s easier to splash the cash on a ready made player


I know this is a side issue that has nothing to do with MK, but I do think reports of the Spurs kids opportunities have been greatly exaggerated. Looking at their squad, the only ones to come solely from their academy are Kane and Winks. Any other youngsters, English or foreign, have been signed from elsewhere where they'd already been first teamers. And they do spend money and mostly on foreigners - wasted almost £50m on 2 failed squad player last season, Sissoko and Janssen. And signed all foreigners this summer as well - Sanchez, Aurier, Llorente. Pocchetino's a good manager and improves players but he's given no more opportunities to Academy products than Mourinho's United (for Kane and Winks read Rashford and Lingard).
End of irrelevant rant.

Keep 'em coming mate....

Author:  Sausage [ Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: harry winks

dons50 wrote:
BertieWoostersDonsClub wrote:
Scribble wrote:
To be fair to Tottenham, for one of the bigger clubs, they do at least give their youth a chance and that’s paid off in spades for them, they don’t have to go out and sign players for 90/100 million pounds plus, they produce their own or as in Dele’s case find young gifted players and develop them.

The other top sides in the Premier league don’t seem to have the patience to develop players, it’s easier to splash the cash on a ready made player
I know this is a side issue that has nothing to do with MK, but I do think reports of the Spurs kids opportunities have been greatly exaggerated. Looking at their squad, the only ones to come solely from their academy are Kane and Winks. Any other youngsters, English or foreign, have been signed from elsewhere where they'd already been first teamers. And they do spend money and mostly on foreigners - wasted almost £50m on 2 failed squad player last season, Sissoko and Janssen. And signed all foreigners this summer as well - Sanchez, Aurier, Llorente. Pocchetino's a good manager and improves players but he's given no more opportunities to Academy products than Mourinho's United (for Kane and Winks read Rashford and Lingard).
End of irrelevant rant.
They spent £5m on some young kid and gave him an opportunity.

That demonstrates his point.

Author:  dons50 [ Tue Nov 14, 2017 5:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: harry winks

Sausage wrote:
dons50 wrote:
BertieWoostersDonsClub wrote:
Scribble wrote:
To be fair to Tottenham, for one of the bigger clubs, they do at least give their youth a chance and that’s paid off in spades for them, they don’t have to go out and sign players for 90/100 million pounds plus, they produce their own or as in Dele’s case find young gifted players and develop them.

The other top sides in the Premier league don’t seem to have the patience to develop players, it’s easier to splash the cash on a ready made player
I know this is a side issue that has nothing to do with MK, but I do think reports of the Spurs kids opportunities have been greatly exaggerated. Looking at their squad, the only ones to come solely from their academy are Kane and Winks. Any other youngsters, English or foreign, have been signed from elsewhere where they'd already been first teamers. And they do spend money and mostly on foreigners - wasted almost £50m on 2 failed squad player last season, Sissoko and Janssen. And signed all foreigners this summer as well - Sanchez, Aurier, Llorente. Pocchetino's a good manager and improves players but he's given no more opportunities to Academy products than Mourinho's United (for Kane and Winks read Rashford and Lingard).
End of irrelevant rant.
They spent £5m on some young kid and gave him an opportunity.

That demonstrates his point.


To an extent, but they still gave a very young player an opportunity. Many other premiership sides buy young players and loan them out, whether bought or home grown, Spurs (or maybe just Pochettino) give youngsters opportunities.

I really hope Dele stays there with him.

Author:  Don Direction [ Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: harry winks

dons50 wrote:

I really hope Dele stays there with him.


Think about the sell on clause!

Author:  dons50 [ Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: harry winks

Don Direction wrote:
dons50 wrote:

I really hope Dele stays there with him.


Think about the sell on clause!


There ain’t no sanity clause.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/