keyser soze wrote:
BristolDon wrote:
keyser soze wrote:
dons50 wrote:
If I did decent due diligence and recruited someone with a good track record and he had a bad start, I would definitely give him (or her) sufficient time to make the job a success.
So much this.
I guess it's a question of when does a bad start just become being bad at the job?
Yes, absolutely.
I really get why everyone is pissed of and why they want him out. But if he goes now, his head coach (Mr Anonymous) will be caretaker. That will likely be worse.
So... leave him in place. Give him a decent chance turn it around. In parallel, PW needs to look at other options. If RN performs a miracle, good for him, good for us. If he doesn't, he goes, at a time of Pete's choosing, with someone better lined up.
Today is NOT the time. Calm the fuck down.
(It won't be long though!)
2 assumptions there:
1) Pete isn't already looking at options. I'm hoping he's learnt from the Robbo scenario and could be looking at options already (possibly looking at other options since day 1, just in case Neilson decided to pack it in etc.)
2) The caretaker will likely be worse. Why would it be his head coach? A lot of people want Rubio for the next manager (I don't know enough about him to make an informed decision), but why not give him the caretaker job to try him out? Or maybe bring in an interim manager (which might be easier to find than a new long term one) while we search for a new proper manager. Why would either of these be worse than Neilson?
Perhaps I haven't been clear, in no way would I want Pete to wield the axe without having thought about succession planning. But I'd like to think a clever business man would learn from experience and have options available to him. And if he doesn't, then he really does need to start finding some.