THE CONCRETE ROUNDABOUT (TCR)

The Unofficial MK Dons Forum. Discuss and debate all things Dons
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 7:23 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:41 pm
Posts: 2847
Donsduck wrote:
Sorry wootton was a far bigger liability today didn't win headers and for two of the goals is caught out on the wrong side of the attacker.

Thought he looked better without Wootton really sisappointed as Imthought Wootton was going to be great for us

Perhaps the back 5 should include Landell Williams and Walsh


I wasn’t impressed by wootton and if i’m Honest I haven’t been all season, his passing is woeful at times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:22 pm
Posts: 2911
keyser soze wrote:
Don Direction wrote:
I like having a back two. The question should be who to play at inside right?

Inside right? You don't mean that, surely?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_(association_football)#Inside_forward


Yes, we should play 2-3-5 every game! Great stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 6:18 pm
Posts: 4167
Location: Scribble Towers
Don’t think a back three really works, EEL especially looks like a fish (or an eel) out of the water.

Stick to the 4 and bring Williams back to the fold


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:56 am
Posts: 9186
Don Direction wrote:
keyser soze wrote:
Don Direction wrote:
I like having a back two. The question should be who to play at inside right?

Inside right? You don't mean that, surely?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_(association_football)#Inside_forward


Yes, we should play 2-3-5 every game! Great stuff.

:lol: With Roy Race as number 9! I'm in!!

_________________
I don't need your ill-informed, half-baked, idiotic opinions. I have plenty of those myself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 4774
keyser soze wrote:
Don Direction wrote:
keyser soze wrote:
Don Direction wrote:
I like having a back two. The question should be who to play at inside right?

Inside right? You don't mean that, surely?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_(association_football)#Inside_forward


Yes, we should play 2-3-5 every game! Great stuff.

:lol: With Roy Race as number 9! I'm in!!


Blackie Gray just behind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:15 pm
Posts: 7656
Location: 1978/79
dons50 wrote:
keyser soze wrote:
Don Direction wrote:
keyser soze wrote:
Don Direction wrote:
I like having a back two. The question should be who to play at inside right?

Inside right? You don't mean that, surely?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_(association_football)#Inside_forward


Yes, we should play 2-3-5 every game! Great stuff.

:lol: With Roy Race as number 9! I'm in!!


Blackie Gray just behind.


Get thee gone to Melchester....

_________________
Gimme Gimme Shock Treatment


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:11 pm
Posts: 41
With Williams as a centre half then we had a good run apart from Boro games. In fact he was motm for a couple of home games then EBL came back. Though got result at Bury with EBL its been downhill since. Can't work out why Neilson dropped Williams and even more so why he hasn't bought him back.

Wootton hasnt impressed either giving the ball away too many times for many games now so was good that he was subbed today.

The 3 x CB isn't the way forward as further limits our already limited attacking displays. Personally I'd like to see Williams and Walsh as paring to see how that works.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:01 am
Posts: 4826
MovingOn wrote:
With Williams as a centre half then we had a good run apart from Boro games. In fact he was motm for a couple of home games then EBL came back. Though got result at Bury with EBL its been downhill since. Can't work out why Neilson dropped Williams and even more so why he hasn't bought him back.

Wootton hasnt impressed either giving the ball away too many times for many games now so was good that he was subbed today.

The 3 x CB isn't the way forward as further limits our already limited attacking displays. Personally I'd like to see Williams and Walsh as paring to see how that works.


Agree except for the last paragraph. Williams & Walsh got caught out too many time last season against the high ball, especially against set pieces. Williams & Wootton worked well, although a three man defence with Walsh, Wootton / Ebanks Landell, Williams could work as equally as well.

_________________
Disclaimer: All my comments are my opinions unless stated otherwise. I'm just a fan following my club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:15 pm
Posts: 7656
Location: 1978/79
we didn't lose........

_________________
Gimme Gimme Shock Treatment


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dazzerdon and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group