THE CONCRETE ROUNDABOUT (TCR)

The Unofficial MK Dons Forum. Discuss and debate all things Dons
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 2:24 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:38 pm
Posts: 5583
First game I've not been able to watch for a while today, so can't pass comment however noted the following in the OS match report -

Ethan Ebanks-Landell miscued a clearance and the ball fell all too perfectly for Doyle, who found the far corner despite Nicholls’ best efforts to keep it out. 1-2.

He's seems to be a decent player, but thats 3 massive errors in the last 3 games from him now. Needs to be careful or he'll find himself dropped.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 1:39 pm
Posts: 957
Id play willliams and walsh as a pair personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:01 am
Posts: 4826
I don't know about being careful but he looked out of his comfort zone as the right side of a three. George W deserves a chance instead.

_________________
Disclaimer: All my comments are my opinions unless stated otherwise. I'm just a fan following my club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:42 pm
Posts: 628
He is a liability an accident waiting to happen. If neilson is going to coninue with a 3 then williams should play instead andEEL should get a few splinters

_________________
Life is like a hot bath. It feels good while you’re in it, but the longer you stay in, the more wrinkled you get.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:15 pm
Posts: 7657
Location: 1978/79
It was a bit of a ghastly spank whichever way you look at it. May have been unlucky but whatever...it cost us. BUT we came back. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

_________________
Gimme Gimme Shock Treatment


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:56 am
Posts: 9186
Lots of their success came down his side and through him. I think they sussed him out pretty quickly. He's much better as part of a traditional back 4.

_________________
I don't need your ill-informed, half-baked, idiotic opinions. I have plenty of those myself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:41 pm
Posts: 2847
keyser soze wrote:
Lots of their success came down his side and through him. I think they sussed him out pretty quickly. He's much better as part of a traditional back 4.


This, I was very surprised neilson didn’t revert to a back four as they carved us open time after time first half.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:22 pm
Posts: 2911
I like having a back two. The question should be who to play at inside right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 9:54 pm
Posts: 563
Sorry wootton was a far bigger liability today didn't win headers and for two of the goals is caught out on the wrong side of the attacker.

Thought he looked better without Wootton really sisappointed as Imthought Wootton was going to be great for us

Perhaps the back 5 should include Landell Williams and Walsh

_________________
2022/23 Runner up: How Crap, Prediction league and football in general
COYD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ebanks-Landell
PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:56 am
Posts: 9186
Don Direction wrote:
I like having a back two. The question should be who to play at inside right?

Inside right? You don't mean that, surely?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_(association_football)#Inside_forward

_________________
I don't need your ill-informed, half-baked, idiotic opinions. I have plenty of those myself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group