It was a bit of a ghastly spank whichever way you look at it. May have been unlucky but whatever...it cost us. BUT we came back.
| THE CONCRETE ROUNDABOUT (TCR) http://www.sitdownorwellstealyourclub.com/phpbb2/ |
|
| Ebanks-Landell http://www.sitdownorwellstealyourclub.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=243 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | East Wing Don [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Ebanks-Landell |
First game I've not been able to watch for a while today, so can't pass comment however noted the following in the OS match report - Ethan Ebanks-Landell miscued a clearance and the ball fell all too perfectly for Doyle, who found the far corner despite Nicholls’ best efforts to keep it out. 1-2. He's seems to be a decent player, but thats 3 massive errors in the last 3 games from him now. Needs to be careful or he'll find himself dropped. |
|
| Author: | Beardhidesboy64 [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ebanks-Landell |
Id play willliams and walsh as a pair personally. |
|
| Author: | ReturnofMoo [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ebanks-Landell |
I don't know about being careful but he looked out of his comfort zone as the right side of a three. George W deserves a chance instead. |
|
| Author: | APMKDon [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ebanks-Landell |
He is a liability an accident waiting to happen. If neilson is going to coninue with a 3 then williams should play instead andEEL should get a few splinters |
|
| Author: | Aliramone [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ebanks-Landell |
It was a bit of a ghastly spank whichever way you look at it. May have been unlucky but whatever...it cost us. BUT we came back.
|
|
| Author: | keyser soze [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ebanks-Landell |
Lots of their success came down his side and through him. I think they sussed him out pretty quickly. He's much better as part of a traditional back 4. |
|
| Author: | Kempstondons6 [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ebanks-Landell |
keyser soze wrote: Lots of their success came down his side and through him. I think they sussed him out pretty quickly. He's much better as part of a traditional back 4. This, I was very surprised neilson didn’t revert to a back four as they carved us open time after time first half. |
|
| Author: | Don Direction [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ebanks-Landell |
I like having a back two. The question should be who to play at inside right? |
|
| Author: | Donsduck [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ebanks-Landell |
Sorry wootton was a far bigger liability today didn't win headers and for two of the goals is caught out on the wrong side of the attacker. Thought he looked better without Wootton really sisappointed as Imthought Wootton was going to be great for us Perhaps the back 5 should include Landell Williams and Walsh |
|
| Author: | keyser soze [ Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ebanks-Landell |
Don Direction wrote: I like having a back two. The question should be who to play at inside right? Inside right? You don't mean that, surely? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_(association_football)#Inside_forward |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|