| THE CONCRETE ROUNDABOUT (TCR) http://www.sitdownorwellstealyourclub.com/phpbb2/ |
|
| Their second goal http://www.sitdownorwellstealyourclub.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=188 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | familymkdonsfan [ Sun Oct 15, 2017 7:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Their second goal |
If you pause the Sky highlights at 28 seconds, it looks very much like their number 18 is offside when the ball is passed to him, unless there is someone keeping him onside out of the picture. Didn't look like that at the time. |
|
| Author: | East Wing Don [ Sun Oct 15, 2017 8:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Their second goal |
familymkdonsfan wrote: If you pause the Sky highlights at 28 seconds, it looks very much like their number 18 is offside when the ball is passed to him, unless there is someone keeping him onside out of the picture. Didn't look like that at the time. The result would have still been 1-0. That game could have gone on for 72 hours and we wouldn't have scored. |
|
| Author: | donmentor [ Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Their second goal |
LouisMKD wrote: familymkdonsfan wrote: If you pause the Sky highlights at 28 seconds, it looks very much like their number 18 is offside when the ball is passed to him, unless there is someone keeping him onside out of the picture. Didn't look like that at the time. The result would have still been 1-0. That game could have gone on for 72 hours and we wouldn't have scored. Looking at the team sheet before the game I could not see where our goals could come from. Particularly with 3 of our 4 strikers sitting on the bench. |
|
| Author: | Kempstondons6 [ Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Their second goal |
donmentor wrote: LouisMKD wrote: familymkdonsfan wrote: If you pause the Sky highlights at 28 seconds, it looks very much like their number 18 is offside when the ball is passed to him, unless there is someone keeping him onside out of the picture. Didn't look like that at the time. The result would have still been 1-0. That game could have gone on for 72 hours and we wouldn't have scored. Looking at the team sheet before the game I could not see where our goals could come from. Particularly with 3 of our 4 strikers sitting on the bench. Yes I agree, I kinda get the leaving Aneke on the bench and bringing him on second half when Pompey have tired a bit but saying that had Aneke had started would we have gone two down? Personally I would always start with my strongest eleven. |
|
| Author: | East Wing Don [ Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Their second goal |
Kempstondons6 wrote: donmentor wrote: LouisMKD wrote: familymkdonsfan wrote: If you pause the Sky highlights at 28 seconds, it looks very much like their number 18 is offside when the ball is passed to him, unless there is someone keeping him onside out of the picture. Didn't look like that at the time. The result would have still been 1-0. That game could have gone on for 72 hours and we wouldn't have scored. Looking at the team sheet before the game I could not see where our goals could come from. Particularly with 3 of our 4 strikers sitting on the bench. Yes I agree, I kinda get the leaving Aneke on the bench and bringing him on second half when Pompey have tired a bit but saying that had Aneke had started would we have gone two down? Personally I would always start with my strongest eleven. Chuks still needs to be eased back into it. Also, he plays up front and the 2 goals were clear defensive errors, so yes we would have gone 2-0 down. |
|
| Author: | Hugo [ Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Their second goal |
Sow, a agard, and aneke, must start on Tuesday, we need to be on the front foot from the start. |
|
| Author: | dons50 [ Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Their second goal |
LouisMKD wrote: Kempstondons6 wrote: donmentor wrote: LouisMKD wrote: familymkdonsfan wrote: If you pause the Sky highlights at 28 seconds, it looks very much like their number 18 is offside when the ball is passed to him, unless there is someone keeping him onside out of the picture. Didn't look like that at the time. The result would have still been 1-0. That game could have gone on for 72 hours and we wouldn't have scored. Looking at the team sheet before the game I could not see where our goals could come from. Particularly with 3 of our 4 strikers sitting on the bench. Yes I agree, I kinda get the leaving Aneke on the bench and bringing him on second half when Pompey have tired a bit but saying that had Aneke had started would we have gone two down? Personally I would always start with my strongest eleven. Chuks still needs to be eased back into it. Also, he plays up front and the 2 goals were clear defensive errors, so yes we would have gone 2-0 down. Aneke is a midfielder. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|