THE CONCRETE ROUNDABOUT (TCR)

The Unofficial MK Dons Forum. Discuss and debate all things Dons
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 2:06 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:15 pm
Posts: 7680
Location: 1978/79
dons50 wrote:
WellDon wrote:
I would be interested to know if there are people on here that think Neilson might be gone at the end of the season, or even Christmas ;), and I don't necessarily mean being pushed out of the door, he could go under his own steam, he won't be the first, and certainly not the last.


I’m pretty sure he will be with us at least until the end of next season. Pete will want stability and Robbie should have at least one more summer to develop the squad he wants.

I don’t see why he would go under his own steam.

Neither do I; it'd be an admission of failure.
Unless some other club makes a bid for him.

_________________
Gimme Gimme Shock Treatment


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2017 8:31 pm
Posts: 3401
Aliramone wrote:
dons50 wrote:
WellDon wrote:
I would be interested to know if there are people on here that think Neilson might be gone at the end of the season, or even Christmas ;), and I don't necessarily mean being pushed out of the door, he could go under his own steam, he won't be the first, and certainly not the last.


I’m pretty sure he will be with us at least until the end of next season. Pete will want stability and Robbie should have at least one more summer to develop the squad he wants.

I don’t see why he would go under his own steam.

Neither do I; it'd be an admission of failure.
Unless some other club makes a bid for him.


Pete is not stupid. He knows that we will be back to square one if we sack him now.

Building things takes time. This time next season if there isn't progress then we panic. Until then he stays.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:34 am 
I think the concept of stability and giving managers time is rubbish in football. It's all about the right fit, not giving managers time for the sake of it.

Teams bring in managers all the time. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. You could bring in a manager and he does rubbish, sack him after 6 months and bring in someone else who does brilliantly. You could change managers 3 or 4 times in a short space of time before getting someone in that the team just clicks with.

Give me an example of when giving a manager time for the sake of it after a shaky start has actually paid off.

Conversely, I can give several examples of when getting rid of several managers in a short space of time has resulted in one that works out:

- Huddersfield changed managers eight times in 3 years before getting David Wagner and are now in the Prem.
- Sheffield United changed managers six times in 4 years before getting Chris Wilder and it just clicked for them.
- Bournemouth changed managers seven times in 5 years before getting Eddie Howe who took them from L1 to the Prem.

Bottom line is, giving a manager time for the sake of it offers no benefit over frequent changes until you get the right one in.


Last edited by FilthyDon on Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:50 pm
Posts: 2613
FilthyDon wrote:
Give me an example of when giving a manager time for the sake of it after a shaky start has actually paid off.

I wasn't about back then, but I hear that Alex Ferguson bloke did alright in the end

_________________
Cuboid of bum fluff


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:40 am 
DippyDon wrote:
FilthyDon wrote:
Give me an example of when giving a manager time for the sake of it after a shaky start has actually paid off.

I wasn't about back then, but I hear that Alex Ferguson bloke did alright in the end


Definitely an exception, and the fact they were one of the richest clubs in the world might have helped with bringing the right players in.

For your typical EFL club, there really isn't any benefit in keeping a manager for the sake of it and giving them 'time to build'. Either it clicks or it doesn't.

Karl Robinson didn't need "time to build". He got us to the playoffs in his first two seasons.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:22 pm
Posts: 2911
FilthyDon wrote:
DippyDon wrote:
FilthyDon wrote:
Give me an example of when giving a manager time for the sake of it after a shaky start has actually paid off.

I wasn't about back then, but I hear that Alex Ferguson bloke did alright in the end


Definitely an exception, and the fact they were one of the richest clubs in the world might have helped with bringing the right players in.

For your typical EFL club, there really isn't any benefit in keeping a manager for the sake of it and giving them 'time to build'. Either it clicks or it doesn't.

Karl Robinson didn't need "time to build". He got us to the playoffs in his first two seasons.


So we should give Robbie to the end of this season seen. We aren't that far off top 6.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2017 8:31 pm
Posts: 3401
FilthyDon wrote:
DippyDon wrote:
FilthyDon wrote:
Give me an example of when giving a manager time for the sake of it after a shaky start has actually paid off.

I wasn't about back then, but I hear that Alex Ferguson bloke did alright in the end


Definitely an exception, and the fact they were one of the richest clubs in the world might have helped with bringing the right players in.

For your typical EFL club, there really isn't any benefit in keeping a manager for the sake of it and giving them 'time to build'. Either it clicks or it doesn't.

Karl Robinson didn't need "time to build". He got us to the playoffs in his first two seasons.


No cause he followed the mighty reign that was Ince Mk2. You don't need to enhance the squad that he brought in. Plus he knew all the players as he was Ince's assistant. Using Robbo doesn't really work for me as he was at the club before he managed us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:52 am
Posts: 107
Warwickdons wrote:
BracknellDons wrote:
Well, I voted with my feet on Sat and left shortly after the 2nd goal went in, this is becoming a far too familiar occurrence....we've got zero passion, lack creativity, width only down one-side - we leak goals and yet Walsh can't get a game!!!!

Chuks & Walsh have to start on Tues.

Didn't want to stand next to you anymore anyway haha In all seriousness, I didn't blame you, fair to say you didn't miss much after you left!


:shock: :D :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 11:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 4781
FilthyDon wrote:
I think the concept of stability and giving managers time is rubbish in football. It's all about the right fit, not giving managers time for the sake of it.

Teams bring in managers all the time. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. You could bring in a manager and he does rubbish, sack him after 6 months and bring in someone else who does brilliantly. You could change managers 3 or 4 times in a short space of time before getting someone in that the team just clicks with.

Give me an example of when giving a manager time for the sake of it after a shaky start has actually paid off.

Conversely, I can give several examples of when getting rid of several managers in a short space of time has resulted in one that works out:

- Huddersfield changed managers eight times in 3 years before getting David Wagner and are now in the Prem.
- Sheffield United changed managers six times in 4 years before getting Chris Wilder and it just clicked for them.
- Bournemouth changed managers seven times in 5 years before getting Eddie Howe who took them from L1 to the Prem.

Bottom line is, giving a manager time for the sake of it offers no benefit over frequent changes until you get the right one in.


Why does football think it's different from the rest of the world?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossroads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 11:29 am 
dons50 wrote:
FilthyDon wrote:
I think the concept of stability and giving managers time is rubbish in football. It's all about the right fit, not giving managers time for the sake of it.

Teams bring in managers all the time. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. You could bring in a manager and he does rubbish, sack him after 6 months and bring in someone else who does brilliantly. You could change managers 3 or 4 times in a short space of time before getting someone in that the team just clicks with.

Give me an example of when giving a manager time for the sake of it after a shaky start has actually paid off.

Conversely, I can give several examples of when getting rid of several managers in a short space of time has resulted in one that works out:

- Huddersfield changed managers eight times in 3 years before getting David Wagner and are now in the Prem.
- Sheffield United changed managers six times in 4 years before getting Chris Wilder and it just clicked for them.
- Bournemouth changed managers seven times in 5 years before getting Eddie Howe who took them from L1 to the Prem.

Bottom line is, giving a manager time for the sake of it offers no benefit over frequent changes until you get the right one in.


Why does football think it's different from the rest of the world?


Because football is more of a short term results oriented business at this level.

Fans and stakeholders want instant results, when they are paying money to watch and support a team, investing so much time and energy following a club, there is only so much lack of progress they can put up with, especially when a manager like Neilson appears to have taken us one step forward, one step backwards since taking over

I don't have a problem with it, its how it is and it will never change. I have never been a fan of giving managers time, plenty have proven you don't need to give managers a transition season or anything like that. We don't owe these managers a career or sympathy, and contracts mean nothing in football these days.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group