Filthy wrote:
I just can't see how any of the current crop of academy grads are going to improve enough to the point where they are regularly challenging for a starting spot. Usually, even us lowly fans can see those younger players who have potential - and let's be honest, none of the current academy grads look exciting enough.
We need to stop handing out contracts like candy. Too many academy grads being given contracts which are later extended, with no progression shown and no end product. Rasulo the most obvious example, but players like Jackson and BTA are getting towards that kind of territory. It's not entirely their fault for not being 'good enough' - we only seem to give them barely a few minutes as a sub to impress, and inevitably that doesn't happen.
Sorry, but I think you’re way off the mark over the potential they have (and more importantly the regard they’re held in by those at the club). Not every lad is going to be first team ready like Dele at 17 and defensive positions certainly means a longer “incubation” until they’re physically capable of playing against senior porous. What’s happening now is that we have a proper under 23’s and that gives youngsters the opportunity to develop. We’re using that, just like every club who runs a proper academy and under 23’s. What you’ve described is the same everywhere else. Players like Rasulo suffered because they had nowhere to go at a key point in their development.
Of course not all will come through, but we simply have to give them that pathway at 18+ and that involves “handing out contracts like candy” as you put it. Another point to consider is that not doing so sends the wrong message to parents about where to send their lad to. There’s a lot of clubs fishing in the same pond.