pay peanuts and you end up with micicche instead of a proper manager

Kudos to you, FD, for keeping your word. But remember when you were calling for Neilson out, and I said whoever we get in it won't take long before a new group are questioning that appointment and calling for another change?
This is what I meant.
And if we'd have appointed an experienced manager and started poorly, it would have been a different group calling for a change.
It's the modern way, but it's not helpful and bloody infuriating, isn't it?
Welcome to my side.

Four losses in a row. Do we get a bonus mark ?

One goal in four games says it all. Yet we persist in playing only one central striker and don't start the two decent young wingers we have available.

Match stats: Shots: Oldham 11 Dons 5. SOT Oldham 2 Dons 1. The commentators on 3 Counties believed that we outplayed Oldham in the first half. The stats say that we didn't.

You can't be surprised that a lot of people are looking askance at the appointment of a totally inexperienced manager who has lost four games on the bounce and only seen his team score a single goal. Of course that was bound to happen!

Implementing change is fine providing that it's the right change. Asking players of moderate ability to play in a sophisticated and positionally demanding manner strikes many of us as not being the sort of change which will get us out of the hole in which we find ourselves.