BuckDon wrote:
Alby39 wrote:
Poch is the epitome of Tottenham.
The others aren't. Tottenham failed them, not the other way around. Poch was content with being a loser at Tottenham. And he took that mentality to Stanford Bridge, whilst swooning for his former employers who happe to be Chelsea's biggest rivals.
He's not in the same league as Mourinho or Conte, but I wouldn't have sacked him (presumably it's more Chelsea than Poch) to go and appoint a manager with even less credentials or pedigree.
He wasn't
sacked though, this is one I actually genuinely consider to be worthy of the mutual consent title.
The past 10/15 days has been weird, he's spoken like a man who knew what was ahead. If he'd been sacked, he'd have been sacked last mo th when they drew to Sheff Utd. Or Bur ley. Or smacked by The Arsenal. Or earlier on in the season when the worst Man Utd team in a generation played like prime Peps Barca against them.
Chelsea are a basket case football club, run by Amateurs and a group of people who don't see eye to eye or agree with the model it should be. That isn't Pochettino's fault. He's the smartest man at that club in a football sense - Chelsea have two sporting directors which is weird in itself and it's always going to cause division.
When the manager doesn't want his captain and a capable effective versatile defender moved on to squeeze in other underperforming players for FFP reasons you can understand his frustration. And he'll find work easy enough whilst Chelsea continue to cause division with their fanbase and recieve laughter and criticism from others deservedly. That model will not be successful. They'll continue to sell assets and not grow a stable team. That's unsustainable for the long term.